Métodos de Avaliação

EXAM (E) 60% Presentation (PP) 10% PROJECT (P) 30% (a nota mínima em qualquer das parcelas é 9) In the evaluation the final mark is obtained by the formula that respects the percentages (0,6*E+0,1*PP+0,3*P) The result of this formula is rounded in a way that individual work is considered more relevant then group work in what concerns the mark. (Normally not integer marks are rounded down if individual marks are lower then group marks. They will be rounded up in the opposite situation) In the exam if you fail multiple-choice questions it counts -0.25. PRESENTATION (PP) All the elements of the group should prepare and (actively) present their Power Point presentation (the group is the same in the PROJECT). Presentations take place in class (practical classes). Each presentation should use 50 to 60 minutes, in order to allow for class discussion at the end of it. Evaluation is basically based on your synthesis power, rigor, structure and critical comments. PROJECT Groups should be autonomous in their execution of the PROJECT. All the elements should become familiar with Microsoft Project and use it in their project work (this will be tested in the oral) Project groups are evaluated by these criteria: Autonomy of the group in their interpretation of the problem, the report will be judged by the synthesis capacity, presentation quality, writing quality, quality of the solution, structure of the text. Each group should present the PROJECT report in paper (maximum 10 pages plus ANEXES) and in a CD in the last theoretical class of the semester. There will be a one hour ORAL discussion with each group in the after class period. This discussion begins with a short presentation of the group work (10 minutes) + If you attend the second exam, please send a mail saying it 5 days before the exam's date. Only registered students can attend the second exam and registrations deadline is 5 days before the exam DISHONESTY: Students are expected to be honest and ethical in their academic work. The following practices are considered as dishonest: ? Cheating- use or attempted use of unauthorized materials, information or study aids ? Fabrication- falsification or invention of any information ? Assisting- helping another commit an act of academic dishonesty ? Tampering- altering or interfering with evaluation instruments and documents ? Plagiarism- representing the words or ideas of another person as one's own When evidence of academic dishonesty comes to the instructor's attention, the instructor will document the incident, permit the accused student to provide an explanation, advise the student of possible penalties, and take action. The instructor may impose any academic penalty up to a FAIL grade in the course after consulting with his or her department chair and informing the student of the action taken.